Just finished a rumble. At one time DirtyDogs were 8000 to 10000 PPs ahead., no disrespect to Gameover, looks like he was streaking alot. But its still a weakness when the rest of your guild isn't keeping up with the leader. Thereby, if another guild, say OC wants it bad enough with enough of us on all of us going like crazy. the other guild will slowly be overwhelmed. One person or two can gem and get massive points, but its still limited. Also unless the person streaking and using massive amounts of gem has a bottomless wallet that to will run out. So you end up with a low participation guild, no matter how much PPs you can get as a PH9 Thanks for the fun Dirty Dogs... So with some people saying only a few gemmers will win massive points and thereby win all the time, i don't think so. You will still require your whole guild to participate at the same effort to win consistently I think that has been the key even when the minis were in the mix, they just overshadowed this weakness. Gems are part of the game, as they should be, but to expect them to win all the time is unrealistic. Yes i only posted the top 20 of each guild i know that..
Having a full guild of active members will beat out having a couple gemmers most of the time if the gemming guild has poor activity in their bottom members. Competitive guilds should trim their fat if they want to win having 10 members that don't contribute much just matches you against bigger guilds, who might have all of their members trying, and that just makes it harder on the players that do try. Having an extra member hurts you if they don't pull their weight.
Only just seen this. Thanks for the fun rumble Oh, Canada. Look forward to the next one. Kev Dirty Dogs
You are welcome @kevedge001 pass it on to the rest of your guild we enjoyed it as well. Always better being a close hard fought one
I love the new system too, but i have a question. If you are going to attack a base that give you 100 points, if I do a 98% you don't get 98 points.. You get less.. I don't understand this.. I tried 500 points bases and did 80+ or 90+% and i get like 300 points.. I think they have to fix this.
You get 25% of available points for 1*, 60% for 2*, and 100% for 3*. 98% is a 2*, and gives 2* level rewards for plunder points, PR gained (or lost if you're defending), and bp.
I want to point out one thing here ... this is an older post and the Plunder Points aren't listed in a high to low score. Look again at the scores ranked 10-20. Even though the scores are probably jumbled up a bit, the 19th ranked players for both teams have relatively equal scores. I don't mean to pick on any player, but looking at GAMEOVER's score ... well he/she scored 60K points on 156 attacks. That average is 389 points per win. That is approximately a 3 star win vs PH8 average. It's not a crazy score to be honest, but if every attack took 3 minutes ... 180 seconds .... 156*180 = 28080 seconds = 468 minutes = 7.8 hrs of play! My hand would be cramped from holding my phone!
